'There is no climate crisis, but there is a crisis of climate superstition, fraud, incompetence, and censorship. And it is being used to terrify children and threaten the future of western civilization.'
Thursday, 8 March 2012
An article yesterday in Forbes Magazine by James Taylor of the now more famous Heartland Institute:
A short article, well worth a read. He puts in revealing juxtaposition some of the propaganda initiatives in schools deployed by those who want children to be alarmed about airborne CO2:
'Force impressionable young students to watch, at least eight times apiece, an Al Gore global warming propaganda movie? – Check!
Keep showing the propaganda movie even after a court of law found numerous important factual errors in the movie? – Check!
Set up National Teach-Ins with environmental activists and other propagandists, while at the same time freezing out participation from non-alarmists? – Check!
Flood the Internet and school district mailboxes with activist global warming curricula? – Check!'
beside this quotation from Michael Mann:
“[T]here was this program to indoctrinate K-9 school children with climate change denial propaganda. To me that is so pernicious, and I am genuinely horrified by it. I’m all too aware that those who will bear the brunt of our emissions today are going to be our children and grandchildren. They’re going to bear the costs of our cheap energy today. So there’s this effort to misinform the very people who will bear the greatest cost of climate change. To me that is so amoral it’s almost hard to put into words.”
He puts in revealing juxtaposition an appeal for a 'rational public debate' by Peter Gleick :
'In his letter in which he admitted stealing Heartland Institute internal documents, engaging in fraud, committing identity theft, and distributing to the media forged documents designed to cast the Heartland Institute in a false and pernicious light, Fakegate perpetrator Peter Gleick claimed he did so because “a rational public debate is desperately needed” and there are coordinated efforts to “prevent this debate.”
beside this observation that that this self-same man was intent on poisoning public discourse and turning down a debate:
'...Gleick, on the very same day that he perpetrated his acts of fraud and theft against the Heartland Institute, turned down a Heartland Institute invitation to publicly debate global warming and share his climate concerns at the Heartland Institute’s annual benefit dinner...'
The moral qualities of some those on the 'other side' of this inadequately debated topic are not at all impressive. The double-speak, the deviousness, the projection, the ruthlessness, and the intolerance are all short of being edifying. And of course, some of them call for no debates at all since since they would give undesirable publicity and recognition to calm, moderate, and well-informed views on climate, And, of course, in the few public or publicised debates that have taken place, such views have been so much more impressive, usually winning the day.
They may win the 'days', but meanwhile the years of climate alarmism accumulate in schools.