What with a Nobel Peace Prize shared
between the IPCC and Al Gore, and no end of awards presented by CO2
alarmists and their followers to one another, the casual observer is
at risk of concluding that wise and distinguished people are leading
the call for dramatic reductions in our CO2 emissions. The reality
is that buffoons and charlatans, confidence tricksters and shallow
opportunists, not to mention malevolent sociopaths, are in this
odious vanguard. Dramatic threats of imminent doom, portentous
language, terrifying imagery about what is going to happen to us are
their stock in trade. A journalist has picked up on summaries of
failed prophecies from such as the WUWT site, and in a recent article at The New American he notes:
'Warnings
have been issued for many decades now regarding catastrophic climate
change that forecasted certain trends or occurrences that we should
already have witnessed. Yet such predictions have turned out to be
very, very wrong. This was certainly the case with the alarmist
predictions of the 1960s and ’70s that man’s activities on Earth
were causing a catastrophic cooling trend that would bring on another
ice age. And it is also the case with the more recent claims about
catastrophic global warming. '
The examples he gives are listed below:
Global cooling – one of the
eco-threats of the 1970s: FAIL (see the article for more details of each fail here and below)
Global warming – one of the
eco-threats from the 1980s onwards: FAIL after FAIL after FAIL:
'In
2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that
imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification
caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive
population disruptions. ' FAIL
'In
its final 2007 report, widely considered the “gospel” of
“settled” climate “science,” the UN IPCC suggested that
Himalayan glaciers could melt by 2035 or sooner.
' FAIL
'Like
the UN, the Pentagon commissioned a report on “climate change”
that also offered some highly alarming visions of the future under
“global warming.” The 2003 document, entitled “An Abrupt
Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States
National Security,” ...
By
now, according to the “not implausible” scaremongering outlined
in the report for a 10-year time period, the world should be a
post-apocalyptic disaster zone. Among other outlandish scenarios
envisioned in the report over the preceding decade: California
flooded with inland seas, parts of the Netherlands “unlivable,”
polar ice all but gone in the summers, and surging temperatures. Mass
increases in hurricanes, tornadoes, and other natural disasters were
supposed to be wreaking havoc across the globe, too. All of that
would supposedly spark resource wars and all sorts of other horrors.'
FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL
'For
well over a decade now, climate alarmists have been claiming that
snow would soon become a thing of the past. In March 2000, for
example, “senior research scientist” David Viner, working at the
time for the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East
Anglia, told the U.K. Independent that within “a few years,”
snowfall would become “a very rare and exciting event” in
Britain. “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he
was quoted as claiming in the article, headlined “Snowfalls are now
just a thing of the past.” '
FAIL
'The
IPCC has also been relentlessly hyping the snowless winter scare,
along with gullible or agenda-driven politicians. In its 2001 Third
Assessment Report, for example, the IPCC claimed “milder winter
temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms.
' FAIL
'In
1988, Hansen was asked by journalist and author Rob Reiss how the
“greenhouse effect’ would affect the neighborhood outside his
window within 20 years (by 2008). “The West Side Highway [which
runs along the Hudson River] will be under water,” Hansen claimed.
“And there will be tape across the windows across the street
because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees
in the median strip will change...There will be more police cars ....
[since] you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.” In
1986, Hansen also predicted in congressional testimony that the Earth
would be some two degrees warmer within 20 years.
' FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL
'Separately,
another prominent alarmist, Princeton professor and lead UN IPCC
author Michael Oppenheimer, made some dramatic predictions in 1990
while working as “chief scientist” for the Environmental Defense
Fund. By 1995, he said then, the “greenhouse effect” would be
“desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with
horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots.” By 1996,
he added, the Platte River of Nebraska “would be dry, while a
continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on
interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers.” The
situation would get so bad that “Mexican police will round up
illegal American migrants surging into Mexico seeking work as field
hands.” ' FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL
FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL
'Perhaps
nowhere have the alarmists’ predictions been proven as wrong as at
the Earth’s poles. In 2007, 2008, and 2009, Al Gore, the high
priest for a movement described by critics as the “climate cult,’
publicly warned that the North Pole would be “ice-free” in the
summer by around 2013 because of alleged “man-made global warming.”
' FAIL
'Even
more embarrassing for the warmists have been trends in the Southern
Hemisphere. Of course, all of the “climate models” and “climate
experts” and “scientists” predicted that rising CO2 emissions
would increase global temperatures, which would melt the ice in
Antarctica - by far the largest mass of frozen H2O on the planet.
' FAIL
'In
his second-term inaugural address, Obama also made some climate
claims, saying: “Some may still deny the overwhelming judgement of
science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires
and crippling drought and powerful storms.” Ironically, all three
of the examples he provided of what he called the “threat of
climate change” actually discredit his argument.
' FAIL FAIL FAIL
The article, by journalist Alex Newman, concludes
'Few
people would make an important decision based on next week’s
weather forecast. When it comes to “climate,” though, the $360
billion-per-year climate establishment is telling humanity that
civilization must be reorganized from top to bottom based on failed
models purporting to make predictions decades and even centuries in
advance. Flawed predictions aside, a great deal of evidence suggests
accuracy or truth was never the intent — generating fear to seize
more money and power was (and is). Many top alarmists have admitted
as much, with some responding to the implosion of their theories with
calls for censorship or, more extreme still, the imprisonment,
re-education, and even execution of “climate deniers.”
'
So, beware of what you are letting into
your classroom should you be tempted to bow to the establishment
pressure to promote acute alarm over our CO2 emissions. The case for alarm
over these emissions is very weak (See for example the recent NIPCC reports). On the other hand, the case for alarm over those those who
promote such alarm is very strong.
