So if the models are so hopelessly riddled with errors and uncertainty that an anthropogenic radiative forcing signal cannot be distinguished from noise, or if the total magnitude of the warming attributed to humans is one-tenth to one-hundredth of the error or uncertainty ranges, why are those who dare question the degree to which humans affect the Earth’s climate branded as “deniers” of science?

Kenneth Richard, http://notrickszone.com/2017/03/13/uncertainties-errors-in-radiative-forcing-estimates-10-100-times-larger-than-entire-radiative-effect-of-increasing-co2/


Thursday, 7 July 2011

Some Sanity for the Climate Classroom: a sensible cartoon on where we are




















The above screenshot is from the animated cartoon which can be watched in the frame below:


Hat-tip: http://joannenova.com.au/2011/07/cartoon-world-of-global-warming-watch-the-message-unfold/

Source: http://www.youtube.com/user/encounterbooks

'A debunking of the left's global warming agenda, from Roy W. Spencer, former NASA climatologist and climate expert. For more on this topic, purchase his new Broadside, "The Bad Science and Bad Policy of Obama's Global Warming Agenda" by clicking here: http://amzn.to/jYWzEH.'
Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvObfrs3qoE

No comments:

Post a Comment