In my opinion this entire sorry episode goes straight to the heart of the difference between the way alarmists like Williamson see the world, and the way normal people view the world. Alarmists seem to want their models, theories and opinions to be accepted as established fact. But the reality is their shaky theories are full of poorly supported conjecture and extrapolation.
Eric Worrall on WUWT, quoted by Dellers who has criticised Williamson's facile alarmism: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/01/09/delingpole-how-i-totally-crushed-the-ocean-acidification-alarmist-loons/
Monday, 28 June 2010
Schools' Low Carbon Day gone not with a bang but a whimper
No pictures. No stories from successful events. No quotes from enlightened children.
Only this (my italics):
'Low Carbon Day has now happened!
Thank you for taking part.
We don't have the resources to continue the site anymore but please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need anything.'
Perhaps someone made some screen captures, or can dig the old pages out of a web archive somewhere?
I reproduced their foundation 'thinking' here: http://climatelessons.blogspot.com/2010/06/schools-low-carbon-day-concerned.html
I shall continue with my promised Fisking of these sorry sentences, on the grounds that similarly shallow thinking may be being used elsewhere to justify who knows what harmful nonsense.