Why is there so much preoccupation with atmospheric CO2 concentrations and reducing anthropogenic CO2 emissions when it is well documented in the peer-reviewed scientific literature that the CO2 contribution to the overall greenhouse effect is so weak that it can be easily supplanted by small changes in clouds and water vapor, or natural climate-changing constituents?
Monday, 28 June 2010
Schools' Low Carbon Day gone not with a bang but a whimper
No pictures. No stories from successful events. No quotes from enlightened children.
Only this (my italics):
'Low Carbon Day has now happened!
Thank you for taking part.
We don't have the resources to continue the site anymore but please email email@example.com if you need anything.'
Perhaps someone made some screen captures, or can dig the old pages out of a web archive somewhere?
I reproduced their foundation 'thinking' here: http://climatelessons.blogspot.com/2010/06/schools-low-carbon-day-concerned.html
I shall continue with my promised Fisking of these sorry sentences, on the grounds that similarly shallow thinking may be being used elsewhere to justify who knows what harmful nonsense.