There is a great deal to be concerned about in the exhibitions of infants and young children being used to carry climate placards last Friday, and of older children presumably choosing to carry them aided and abetted by teachers, parent, and others. It is not difficult to find photographs in the news media to illustrate adults posing with infants, and adults urging on older children to perform for the mass media, some carrying placards provided by political groups such as the 'Socialist Workers'.
Some of the
participants will have done it for a bit of a laugh – after all, it is
different and it is attention-getting. Some are too young to know
what is being done to them. But how can they best be helped if their
teachers, in particular, are happy to see them used as placard
carriers in school time? Some participants are adults who have been
through the education system in recent decades, and these are perhaps
the biggest immediate concern since they may be the hardest to help. The youngsters may still be impressionable enough to be
reached (somehow) in due course by calmer, more rational, more
informed, and more scientific perspectives on climate variation and
what we know about it. But who will help the adults with minds made
up, and how will they do it?
In our booklet,
Climate Control , Andrew Montford
and I called, in 2014, for an official inquiry into the extent of climate alarm
scaremongering in UK schools. We suspected this scaremongering was
widespread since we had evidence of it in many areas of the
curriculum. The events of last Friday suggest we were right to be
suspicious, and that the need is still there for an inquiry to help
establish just how bad it is.
Astro-Turfing at Work?
There is another,
less obvious reason for concern, and that is the existence of
organisations intent on manipulation of children for political ends.
As ever with ideologically-driven agitation, ‘the issue is not the
issue’. Climate alarm is merely a hot topic that serves sundry
purposes. The manipulators need not care two hoots about the details
of the flimsy arguments for alarm, or critiques of them, when they can just ride on the waves of
political and financial support these arguments have provided, and
step off them on to other waves in due course. But they leave behind people damaged because
they have come to believe in one or more of the scare stories being
pushed upon them.
This may be one such
organisation in the States. It was not at all clear to me who they are from their website called 'Schools for Climate Action' but they, or he or she, claim:
‘We
are a non-partisan, grassroots, youth-adult campaign with a mission
to empower schools to speak up for climate action in order to protect
current and future generations.‘
Here is another possible one, in Australia, called 'School Strike 4 Climate Australia'
who say:
'We are school students from cities and towns across Australia. Most of us have never met before but are united by our concern about our planet. We are striking from school to tell our politicians to take our futures seriously and treat climate change for what it is - a crisis.'
Jo Nova noted in 2015, Greens using school children in Australia by getting them to write contrived letters to politicians:
' Gary Johns (former Labor Minister in the Keating Government) writes in The Australian that children are being dished up green speakers at school, asked to write letters about “their thoughts” to politicians, and taking letters home to parents seeking their permission to join the campaign which is run by a volunteer for The Greens. The children were offered sample activist letters to copy.'
Dennis Ambler, in a recent comment at the Climate Scepticism blog has drawn attention to some more useful links in this area: 'Oz Journalist Tony Thomas has spent a lot of time investigating the groups behind these propaganda strategies which are and have been operating in Australia again with Teacher support:'
There are also a good few to be found amongst my own listings of websites aimed at children or teachers about climate.
The Sad Story of Swedish Schoolgirl Greta Thunberg
On WUWT earlier this year:
That is the title of a post which provides a link to a video of Greta giving a TED talk. It is quite moving to see such a young person making her statements like that, ill-informed though they are. But as well as being a victim of climate scaremongering, she may also be a victim of PR-driven manipulation.
Andrew Montford has provided some background on this here, making use of research published in the Swiss Swiss magazine Weltwoche . Here are some extracts from Andrew's article (as reported here):
'Thunberg’s profile has only grown since. Her appearance at the UN climate conference in Poland propelled her to international fame. Most recently she was in Davos. Her message to the billionaires at the World Economic Summit was stark: ‘I want you to panic’ about climate change.'
and
'However, her sudden appearance in the limelight has led to some pointed questions: is Greta’s celebrity status less to do with chance and more to do with a carefully orchestrated public relations campaign?
and
'It revealed that Thunberg’s school strike had coincided neatly with the launch of a book about climate change written by her mother, Malena Ernman. Is this a coincidence? It looks less like one when you learn from the same article that the first publicity of Thunberg’s protest came via the social media of the book’s PR man, Ingmar Rentzhog, on the day of its launch.'
and
'Further worrying details have also emerged. As well as working for Greta’s mother, Rentzhog had also recently launched a business called ‘We Don’t Have Time’, a sort of climate-focused PR agency. In October 2018, he invited Greta to join the company’s Youth Advisory Board and in the weeks that followed he used her image intensively ahead of the company’s share issue. This seems to have been very successful, bringing in something short of a million pounds. But whatever the figure, Greta has proved to be an extraordinarily lucrative asset for Mr. Rentzhog, and the environmental press has been extraordinarily helpful too.'
Meanwhile, a UK schoolgirl 'striker' speaks out in The Guardian
Here’s an essay by
one of the older schoolchildren (17 years old) who have ‘gone on
strike’. She clearly has wound herself up into quite a state of
fury and dismay over climate. Her position seems to be: some
scientists have said we are facing catastrophe, therefore we are
facing catastrophe, therefore grown-ups should be behaving as if we
were. This is not a substantial position given the feebleness of the
case for that ‘catastrophe’. Nor does it take note of the
massive harm that would likely follow from even more grown-ups
supporting ‘climate action’. Too much harm has already been
done, and the momentum of such as the UK’s Climate Change Act does
not yet seem spent.
Forward tho I canna see ...
So, there are groups
of people who will be pleased with what happened last Friday. Is this
their last hurrah?
Will wiser minds (and wiser heads of schools)
begin to prevail to (a) discourage this mass truancy, (b) investigate
how it came to pass, and (c) look for ways to help the children and
adults develop a calmer, more informed view of climate variation. Geoff Chambers points to the children's crusades of the 13th century - hopefully an implausible scenario for what might happen next, but a cautionary tale nevertheless:
'It started as a quasi-religious movement, led by a few persuasive individuals who created an atmosphere of mass hysteria which infected the uneducated and intellectuals alike; then it became an intergovernmental affair, organised at the supranational level; but due to international rivalries and the failure to agree on objectives, it petered out. Its final manifestation was as a mass movement of children (egged on by adults) which ended in slavery or death by starvation for most of the participants.'
There is to be another exhibition of 'climate alarmed children' in the UK, and elsewhere, on 15th March. Perhaps that will give us more insight into the further success of those who would use children as pawns and placard bearers ostensibly for the cause of climate alarm.
Note added 19 Feb 2019. Speculation in Germany and elsewhere that Russia is behind recent climate demonstrations by schoolchildren. They were behind such groups as the CND in the 1960s, so it would not surprise me if they were using their agitprop skills to manipulate youngsters and associated useful idiots in order to weaken 'the West'.
See: https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/is-russia-behind-climate-change-protests-in-eu-definitely-yes-says-ukraine
(hat-tip GWPF https://mailchi.mp/1f95a254fdb2/german-climate-law-put-off-as-government-splits-deepen )
Note added 20 Feb 2019. Andy Shaw has written a thoughtful, sympathetic essay about the schoolchildren's protests. He also has some ideas on how we can help them:
'I think that we should appeal to positive side of young people protesting. We should appeal to their sense of agency and purpose. Many teenagers are intellectually curious and want to work things out for themselves. Everyone feels the need to fit in, but not necessarily follow the herd.
Note added 19 Feb 2019. Speculation in Germany and elsewhere that Russia is behind recent climate demonstrations by schoolchildren. They were behind such groups as the CND in the 1960s, so it would not surprise me if they were using their agitprop skills to manipulate youngsters and associated useful idiots in order to weaken 'the West'.
See: https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/is-russia-behind-climate-change-protests-in-eu-definitely-yes-says-ukraine
(hat-tip GWPF https://mailchi.mp/1f95a254fdb2/german-climate-law-put-off-as-government-splits-deepen )
Note added 20 Feb 2019. Andy Shaw has written a thoughtful, sympathetic essay about the schoolchildren's protests. He also has some ideas on how we can help them:
'I think that we should appeal to positive side of young people protesting. We should appeal to their sense of agency and purpose. Many teenagers are intellectually curious and want to work things out for themselves. Everyone feels the need to fit in, but not necessarily follow the herd.
We should pose questions. Is this really true? Is this the only way of looking at it? What do other people say? Everything has a cost and a benefit, what are they? Where debate is closed down and one side are castigated and labelled, independent thinkers should ask why.'
Note added 02 Mar 2019. More evidence of sinister exploitation of young people by persons possibly unknown: an 'open letter' published in the Guardian, and reported on here at WUWT:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/02/we-the-young-open-letter-from-the-student-climate-change-strikers/
No comments:
Post a Comment