Spotting climate materials that deserve to be binned is going to be a task for years to come given the amount of junk that can be found so easily.
Here are three recent headlines from the JunkScience blog, along with some suggestions to help clear them up if you find them in your curricula.
For getting started on a less emotive view of ocean pH see this piece and the links within it: http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/scripps-blockbuster-ocean-acidification-happens-all-the-time-naturally/
For teachers looking for materials to restore some semblance
of scientific sense, here is a lead relating to species extinctions - it has a fairly large set of links for further study:
The article notes “The
IPCC has abandoned Mann’s. Marcott has debunked his own. Why is NOAA teaching
this junk?”
The shoddy analyses that led to the Mann and the Marcott
hockey-stick plots have been well publicised now. It is heartening that whereas it took years
to expose the former thanks to obfuscation and obstruction, the latter was
undone in a matter of weeks.
The three examples are from recent posts on Junk Science,
written by Steve Milloy. He is described
there as ‘a recognized leader in the fight against junk science with
more than 20 years of experience. He is the founder and publisher of
JunkScience.com, and an environmental and public health consultant. Mr. Milloy
is a biostatistician and securities lawyer who has also been a registered
securities principal, investment fund manager, non-profit executive, and a
print/web columnist on science and business issues.’
Well done, Steve Milloy.
No comments:
Post a Comment