So if the models are so hopelessly riddled with errors and uncertainty that an anthropogenic radiative forcing signal cannot be distinguished from noise, or if the total magnitude of the warming attributed to humans is one-tenth to one-hundredth of the error or uncertainty ranges, why are those who dare question the degree to which humans affect the Earth’s climate branded as “deniers” of science?
Thursday, 9 February 2017
Tell Your Children: 'sustainable development' means 'suppressed development'. Resist it.
'Green Power, Black Death', has just published a new essay on WUWT pointing out many absurdities and harms associated with 'sustainability'. An extract is given below, but see the original for a great deal more. Anyone concerned with protecting children from the excesses of eco-fanatics ought to read it. Some may choose to specialise in this area. I hope.
"As President Trump downgrades the relevance of Obama era climate change and anti-fossil fuel policies, many environmentalists are directing attention to “sustainable development.”