Millions of vehicles were recalled around the world, and a new TLA spread: UIA - un-intended acceleration. Sounds scary! Better do something! The theatre is on fire! Everybody out! No time to waste!
Except it was a false alarm:
'NASA's Toyota Study Released by Dept. of Transportation 02.08.11'
"NASA found no evidence that a malfunction in electronics caused large unintended accelerations," said Michael Kirsch, principal engineer and team lead of the study from the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) based at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va.'
This would be a good project for senior pupils interested in current affairs: a side by side comparison of the climate scare and the accelerator scare. They are on different scales, but they share much in common:
(1) something scary for the general public
(2) a simple theory to convey 'knowledge' of the reason for the scare
(3) self-serving groups joining in the alarmism in which they have spotted advantage
(4) hasty legislation or the threat of it
(5) resources diverted to unnecessary actions
(6) in retrospect, revealed to be unfounded and foolish
Would that NASA, which led the investigation into the Toyota recall (http://www.nasa.gov/topics/nasalife/features/nesc-toyota-study.html), would display the same disinterested and analytical approach on climate. But no, that would be naive, since they are a prominent example of stage (3) above.
Stage (6) is still underway on climate alarmism, and is taking far longer. The climate stage (3) was just on so much greater a scale, aided and abetted by massive state funding for such as the IPCC, and the far larger set of parties who spotted political, financial, or merely career opportunities in and around the scaremongering.