So if the models are so hopelessly riddled with errors and uncertainty that an anthropogenic radiative forcing signal cannot be distinguished from noise, or if the total magnitude of the warming attributed to humans is one-tenth to one-hundredth of the error or uncertainty ranges, why are those who dare question the degree to which humans affect the Earth’s climate branded as “deniers” of science?
Monday, 28 June 2010
No pictures. No stories from successful events. No quotes from enlightened children.
Only this (my italics):
'Low Carbon Day has now happened!
Thank you for taking part.
We don't have the resources to continue the site anymore but please email email@example.com if you need anything.'
Perhaps someone made some screen captures, or can dig the old pages out of a web archive somewhere?
I reproduced their foundation 'thinking' here: http://climatelessons.blogspot.com/2010/06/schools-low-carbon-day-concerned.html
I shall continue with my promised Fisking of these sorry sentences, on the grounds that similarly shallow thinking may be being used elsewhere to justify who knows what harmful nonsense.