Why is there so much preoccupation with atmospheric CO2 concentrations and reducing anthropogenic CO2 emissions when it is well documented in the peer-reviewed scientific literature that the CO2 contribution to the overall greenhouse effect is so weak that it can be easily supplanted by small changes in clouds and water vapor, or natural climate-changing constituents?
Monday, 11 October 2010
10-minute trainers on climate nonsense: materials for at least 94 of them
'No science produces more controversy, exaggerations, distortions, follies, and falsehoods than climate science does. In this new list we’ve got