Why is there so much preoccupation with atmospheric CO2 concentrations and reducing anthropogenic CO2 emissions when it is well documented in the peer-reviewed scientific literature that the CO2 contribution to the overall greenhouse effect is so weak that it can be easily supplanted by small changes in clouds and water vapor, or natural climate-changing constituents?
Tuesday, 13 July 2010
Don't let your children near St Thomas University, Mrs Worthington...
A Professor Abraham of St Thomas University in the States published a snide, superficial, supercilious, and super-silly online presentation that presumably reflected his teaching style, his integrity, and his grasp of climate science.
The C3 site describes him as the 'Bozo of St Thomas':
Viscount Monckton, whose earlier presentation was the target of Abraham's, has replied at length. After first giving Abraham a month to explain himself and respond to Monckton's concerns. Answer was there none.
You can reach the offending presentation (83 minutes, with soundtrack and slides) and get Monckton's detailed response in a pdf file via here:
Or you can get the rebuttal directly from the SPPI site here: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/response_to_john_abraham.html
Monckton's response would be a good gift for a senior school pupil looking for a suitable university and a suitable degree. It will encourage them to be very careful where they go, as well as show them how a civilised man debates.
Who knows how many Abraham-clones there are in the UK alone?