In my opinion this entire sorry episode goes straight to the heart of the difference between the way alarmists like Williamson see the world, and the way normal people view the world. Alarmists seem to want their models, theories and opinions to be accepted as established fact. But the reality is their shaky theories are full of poorly supported conjecture and extrapolation.
Eric Worrall on WUWT, quoted by Dellers who has criticised Williamson's facile alarmism: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/01/09/delingpole-how-i-totally-crushed-the-ocean-acidification-alarmist-loons/
Tuesday, 13 July 2010
Don't let your children near St Thomas University, Mrs Worthington...
A Professor Abraham of St Thomas University in the States published a snide, superficial, supercilious, and super-silly online presentation that presumably reflected his teaching style, his integrity, and his grasp of climate science.
The C3 site describes him as the 'Bozo of St Thomas':
Viscount Monckton, whose earlier presentation was the target of Abraham's, has replied at length. After first giving Abraham a month to explain himself and respond to Monckton's concerns. Answer was there none.
You can reach the offending presentation (83 minutes, with soundtrack and slides) and get Monckton's detailed response in a pdf file via here:
Or you can get the rebuttal directly from the SPPI site here: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/response_to_john_abraham.html
Monckton's response would be a good gift for a senior school pupil looking for a suitable university and a suitable degree. It will encourage them to be very careful where they go, as well as show them how a civilised man debates.
Who knows how many Abraham-clones there are in the UK alone?